RAMBLING RHETORICAL REVIEW

 

The president is not an officer?

He was not in office?   

He is Prohibited from holding office.

Projection of Trump is Shakesperian perfection. ( My take on reference made on MSNBC.)

What about originality language?  Textualist court?

There is no perfect sentence.  That is how logic works.

Proof of imperfection.

—-

Proof of the Trinity.

Logic the President, Trump cannot hold the office.  That doesn’t mean he can’t be a candidate. 

Proof of the scientific  principle of denial.

See Popper

 12/19 (edited: 12/20)

On Alex Wagner/Tonight

Overton Window

Julian Castro frmr sec housing and urban development 

Sent from my iPhone

Two-wrongs don't mean a Left[!]

Too reads do not mean a dialogue. 

Mid-read(NFRY): (i.e. live footnoting)
Survival of the fittest verses(~) corporate species and arms races[!]
Battle of the Narratives? (Corporate offspring, peacocks and elk.)
(head or tails not treated equally, but...)[somewhat akin to gander or goose?]
[fundamental try-vergence]...(grain v ladder)[LOL read v regulations]
Survival of the Narratives?

4-3-16 to read:
The Atlantic: Obama Doctrine
4-4-16
Hedges/Hudson on Neo-Liberal Economics.

[related (b.s.): Spencer... demo/mice...DecomPart * Meantalizing]
*Moline's Platonics  / Darwinian Physics

TRY-ANGLE NATION

Disclosure:  Just elected Hillary Clinton Delegate for my precinct. 

It was a gut decision for a truce between my head and my heart, not that I can triangulate that. 
Well... maybe it was gut-Clinton, head-Undecided, and heart-Sanders. 

With this in mind to be potentially sorted later:

Make It So[!]

To better BORG*: 
(third link below NFRY: not fully read yet)

A World War Has Begun: Break the Silence  ***

Why Young People Are Right About Hillary Clinton
Trump and Clinton Match-up?

*"BS~FD/make me" (0)
"BS~Borg" (A., B. Culture War , C., D.  Obama With Drama , E., F., G., H.)
(BS)=blog search (scroll over any hyper-links)

3-27-16

War and Peace is a false dichotomy**.

That was my heading(sub-heading for this addition) before technical difficulties wiped it out. 
I had woken up to that thought after reading only part way through a Philosophy Now article last night. [The "Ugliest of Things"?]

** or are all dichotomies false? 

*** the punch line
"You can't _ _ _ _ _ your way out of problems with the same parties that got you into them."
to paraphrase the Obama problem and the nature of our government.  Here "parties" is used in general terms, but with due respect for the three branches of government and the GOP, let alone the spirit of progress or hope to Trump nature.  I am talking about the first article on War, and the Bush campaign that was a bull in a pottery barn.(~)  (Speaking of policemen, nation builders and break it)

(~)(<) Lessons of War , Cost of Course [(~)]
Cost of Course [!], Hail to the Troops! [!]
Owe what a muddle we web. i.e. these (F'n) need review.

3-31-16
Expletive not intended, Foot Notes is the italic intent. 
Mean While... (M'w,huh,ha) 
Medved(msnbc)  (~) the last conservative president was H. W. Bush (i.e. don't count Neo-cons)
Kasich  (msnbc)  Trump puts the con in conservative. (^) Also speaks of policing and intelligence, I was waiting for nation building.
Kinder Gardener:  Do I have buyers remorse?
Well, I haven't bought anything.  And we aren't a pottery barn.  (oops unsegue)^
(return) Is the caucus system broken?  Not for Bernie.  Is the primary better? Only for Hillary?   

All Blank are not created equally.

Under 4eh[!]

OK, one of the A's was "anecdotal".  Not only that it was an old story and not much of one.
(Open carry robbed of gun at gun point.)
One of the four blank or Hume or everything. 
"Kant we get along..." etc.
Let alone Bane or...Mill.
Let alone "Math is next to..." rhetoric of the I ron knee age.

Just because you think(...) doesn't mean someone is not.
Tan gent: Hegelian Fallacy. 

https://www.fhu.com/hegelian.html

http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Hegelian+dialectic*

http://www.therightplanet.com/2014/01/hegelian-dialectics-for-dummies/

*Not to mention, not all links are created equal.

[  http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm ]

An  Inconvenient Truth ?

Or unweaving of a quilt?

[2A] Academics is like congress, you have to remember there is always perspectivism. 

Three Muskateers?

OK, they are simply in my Inbox.**


Team Baldwin
Ed Markey
Can't Recall... LOL*
...


Mean~while?

*(7-24-15) Sherrod Brown
** lede or ship (or sort of outliers)

Writing while nuanced.

Several alternatives to this heading were considered.  "Reading while nuanced." 
"Something while white." "Anything while Brooks."  OK, they all kind of evolved.*





My point is that Brooks and West are both critical of Coates from a Dream Perspective.






Mean~while there aRe other Elements** of Style[!]







* on the other hand
(Elements) italicized till read  / Bolds emphasized read.


Not to be misunderstood, West is about realizing the dream, Brooks is about not realizing the perspective.  Both attempt to compliment, but then...there may be the need to complement.
[...UC]


(7-24-15) NFRY SEGWAY:  Prior to the Sandra Bland "tragedy"*, I had my own experience with a traffic stop.  I was going 48 in a 35, on 4th of July, just outside Mount Rainier National Park. (So the officer told me.)  Actually I wish I could recall how he framed his initial comments in the form of a question.  I was completely accepting of his information, although my wife thought it may have helped if I had thrown in a "sir" here or there.

What occurred to me later, was what form of answer was I expected to give.  I mentioned having just pulled over to allow tailgaters to pass and had just pulled back into traffic and maybe been concerned about those that may be about to replace them, not remembering the speed had been reduced from 55mph.  Actually I know I am now recalling it more carefully, than I probably framed the answer at the time.  The point is whether it is a practice to frame charges in the form of a question?  Of course remembering the question and giving an accurate answer may be beside the point.  Are there appropriate answers that would change the situation?  Thankfully several inappropriate answers or questions did not occur to me. 

*debacle

File of sorts.

Not exactly the proverbial round file, but I have resorted to NFRY's or QCON's where often the T'wain shall meet.  Stop.

1. Not fully read yet.
2. Quick comment on news.
4. wane
3. tan gent
a. b. c. d. (...) thru ?
a2 Dark Matter, Anti-Matter (...) r2
a3 Mitt's BO*Son , d3 Bring It On!

The point being, that there is reading between the lines and there is lede or ship.

1.g Try Lemmings, j Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!, m ANN,  h2 Clinton(Bill) is full of B.S.
2. Lemon Ship

Then there is (sc)[scroll/or/click] of share 'n angle or* lemon plank.
A, Breaking Trojan Goat* Leaks B.Fight On!, C, D Leaking Intelligence, E. Odyssey Dawn, F. Seconds, G. Roger That "V"
* of/or

Mean while ...
3. a. Future Bubble?, b. Skipping Geometry, c. Un-Hyper Links, d. Bricks and stones, e. Unspinning Charlotte!,

...Rubi'O's** Cube? Oops, I mean Walker's run.

** OW

[ThinkProgress,  OurFuture.Com ]

Crime and Amnesty!

Not to parallel the plot but only the lede or ship* of crime and punishment, just how can wars be prosecuted if we don't appreciate the lede or ship.** 

Not to be facitious or overly optimistic, but maybe a call for complete amnesty is in order.  I know it is pi in the sky, but considering the alternatives and the GOP.

Goal of Progress ?

* read it or... [mo'moss?]
(let alone gold 'n mean?)

**It may have been nice to order the inserts, but 2L8. 

Intelligence is a three-way street?

Such is the right ?

(under construction began 5-19-15)

In the mean time?

There are rights, there is the right and there is right. 
The Right to Rise is the inspiration or project for the new American Millenium.*

* Hoyle? A. Bin(un)Jun'Go , B. "Timing is everything.", C. Tidal Report, D. There was the 3 AM call... , E. We R all Right? , F., G., H., I., J?.  

Bin(un)Jun'Go

2 links
in progress.
Steve Smith (watching)in progress. [('n Strauss)!]

Previous reference and reL8ted viewings.

i.p. Fukuyama/Kaplan...

(ReLabelism)
[/] 1. (FP!) , 2. Proof of Life... 3. The Hope
i.p.  1.  ★Re-initialism★ , 2. Mises... , 3. Cultural Threads are Fine. 4.  Neo-Context

March Forth ?  [Lost in the Phrey?]

3-5-15: 1st things (above 'n labels!). 
Lede or Ship? [C-font!] (intro/content/) (heading/goal?)
Bin- parsing of bingo and un-circular file / (un)~Jung or circular / Go~Hegelian [!]
Line 3 some articles and links re: Steve Smith (Straussian?)
L4: PR& Strauss Lectures.

Note: It may not be obvious, but I don't always get back to read everything labeled NFRY or NFR.
While NFR may mean not necessarily needing to, NFRY indicates a hope to.  Then
fortuitus $hits happen.  Like the opening of the last link(LM frying pan), and the parsing of 4-2-it-us?  Not to men shun(A2~?)   [ahhhh! ???] Let alone one liners.*

Now to the^^ point at the mo'ment.  Acon Ference? **

*(FPip)(???)~ The Un-Revolved(~) Thread / (ahhh)~ commercial goat scream / (?)~Jenga / (A2)~et tu / (shun) USCroll click / (men)~[lost or redone'dented] / (to)~Jung& / GnotS

** a file of sorts un red[!]or yetT for 2? (Or tent4text) /~gno-M~BA
Loose unMbeds? O'w[!]? ^
^D'Ribble saved in draft
^^ 2B read and viewed
[ final note !: that's the ticket ? ] ( fp: Still in draft? ) [knot necessarily gunuh]
fur cation?




Saux?(~\~) ow~/~ew what?



That's what!

Net and Yahoo?

No disrespect.
Nor circular wag'N train.
or empty chair ?

[!] It must mean... [!]
[the un-tan'g'ent]

^?~ n ? : x. The New Compendium y. The Billy Club... z. More Gill~Let? [!]

War on Hillary[!]

I really mean war on demographics!
The Iron Knee of Culture* Wars?




OW [!]


(FP1)







Deval Patrick Cycle ? [!]
Webb / Patrick R/D.
NOW w/Corn on DHS! 
House of WeGeBoard.


[!]=sarcasm/irony/RMJ 


* R.I.P.


~p. (knot even to nostalgia)
Read!4 / enantiodromia?
Not the schilling or gamer I meant [!] ?

AsIMovian Principles.

SciFi? Non-Fi?
Foundations?

Words, Math, Pictures(geometry),
Reality, subjective, objective.
4 p or 4 m / mean, rod knee, Hume, Kant

Two branches of the middle.

(rough heading / draft) 9-24-14
C-ruff raft.

Meanwhile: is Bush*/Paul a challenge? 

*link insert 9-25-14

Knot Gun nuh due it.

Oh Really Fog.

(convenient obtuseness)
i.e. lede or ship(con text)
& I don't mean the MASH corporal.

[Pulled to draft as I had yet to even begin the read.]
On third take*, I will leave it as preempted.

*at witch point I insert 3 links above[!]

[Post scan but pre-read... i.e. not Evelyn Wooded. 
I cherry pitted a read, and leap.

Taughtology or tut-tutology?

Stallin' collectivists ?
Knot so fast.

Bad cop, no cop. 
In reference to the divide*** and the "end justifies the means" irony.

A. The end does not justify the means. 
B. That does not mean that the means is not justified. 
C. Or that all ends don't need means. 
Or that the person who said A. justifies B.
Or that C is justified or not in B.

Now back to the Cop word play.  Amy Goodman with Noam Chomsky agreeing with Ron Paul.  The irony is platonic^socratics in an Aquawhynian(stet)* way.  Antagonist to bad cop is Chomsky. 
Protagonist of no cop, Paul ? **


***  Spoiler Alert uniter? (also click later ABC links)
New Label : hoodology
^ Need to Re-read or De-context: Slate.
* UW (unique words)
** OW
[Not to be branch dividian.]
mea cul...pa ? [!]

Mises...

in the corner ?

Caution: I have only read the last link, and this might seem a balancing* of fallacies**.
Just because you don't agree with someone doesn't mean they have nothing to offer, and of course your perspective might influence both.  Ths seems more a selection of unfinishted reads, although I did read Huntington, and gave a good shot at Sandel, and found Hasnas, and Fukuyama is a big bugaboo, as we come around to Nietzsche and Rand. 

*read juggling ?
** all thinking must be taken in the context of their times as well as the method of the format.
example:  Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Augustine***, Aquinas and the web they weave sometimes in character or others.  Not to mention More's the Pity.

a. A Shot in the Arm?
(b.)^ The Bully...
c. GOP-GAP

^ new notation for (sc)
*** Punderous Ponderings
[Speaking of the corner, is it MAR (mutually assured rhetoric?)  The corollary, just because some have something to offer, does not mean they got it.]
(pocket ?)

Speculative Physics

Math is next to Godliness? ^
Or sixth sense?

Not just^ another Sunday ! ?

(Not that Socrates is alive[!])

[eff'notes: As of this time there are four lines above. Links inserted line 3, then 4, then 2.  Not to force or farce the model, but there is an event horizon.]

[ seg weigh ? ... is tough to track down ... ? ]

1-27-14  Not that I had any* mocumentary intent. But there was the Pro Bowl with intent to do something different and I had run across a YouTube on a different singularity.  Note that** my "sixth sense" is reference to the six edges of a tetrahedron which has four points.^^  My point of departure or parsing is that we may have a chicken and egg, not to mention crossing the road and sky dilemma.  While the singularities of Chomski and Hawking are different, that does not mean that we dismiss clause wits [!][?] ***

 

* Caging Godzillas 
^ or amer mots? French for "bitter words"
** further tangents?  (math and intelligence)
^^ at this point I will note that I have still to read three:
It's About Blackmail, Not National Security
Get Ready for Rand Paul
Stephen Hawking: Black Holes May Not Have 'Event Horizons' After All
Related ?




*** Our Hierarchy of Needs

[OW ? ! ? ? ]
And the past four ?
Foot notes ?
Not that there is anything in HeyDigger[!] butt ... ? [!] ?

^quote is my creation (recent search and non-related googles).

escapement?

While thinking about the type of people who can take a watch apart and put it back together again, I thought... I've never done that.  But in thinking about the mechanics of it, I may have recalled
something in regards to the nature of pendulums, springs and gears.  The term "escapement" came up in regard to clocks on the History Channel. That aside I may not get around to taking a clock apart, let alone following up* on the particulars of what I will now put together, but it feels** similar. 

How Many Ways Can Maureen Dowd Embarrass Journalism? by Charles Pierce Esquire**
Tea Party hatches quiet-but-insane plot against democracy: Meet the “12 Percent Solution” by Paul Rosenberg ***

P versus NP problem wikipedia with credit to Elementary
The Secular Coalition and Religious Freedom Day. 

* 1-17-13 added 2 inserts based on heading alone, and added labels
** (indicating read) Journal** about Journalism and Humor (Manichean Duelity) (Hegel tine Identity?)
*** only begun to fight(I mean read)(OW)^

Note: there are 3(**) but only one Mani[!] (buh dump ump)(ow)

^ 1-19-14: Before I go further. (bdu)
to reads: Personally I do not think Edward Snowden is a whistle-blower, nor is the debate over. Nor is the last read yet connected to the second to last, but maybe to the further and the branching problem.

Epicyclical Poet Tree

The Ying and Yang of our Duelity*.

Life is the content in context**.


*this line is the lede / our Nietzsche the heading / the word is b.s.^
** Is this line the Hitch or Hedge hiker?

(FP!)  notation means to eventually transfer to (FP#)

^ I don't mean THE word, but duelity^^ is more like TryUnism. ***

*** I am not a #[!] nor just pun. (FP2)

^^ Spoiler Alert: Not actually, but I just found a legitimate prior user of the word, so I cannot claim coin-age, let alone be sure I have not run into it via its usage somewhere.
*^ / ^^  i.e. "duelity" is no longer my coinage. In fact I must revamp or revisit coin-age v. coin age and labels.  However I may have exfloE8ed TryUnism with Twryality. (Think Domino Theory and 4D Jenga!) (Jenga is already 3D, and Dominoes is not the theory but about Hoyle.)